ECONOMICAL+PANDEMICAL+DECLASS-ATTEMPTED COUP. THE BRITISH ROGUE EMPIRE STILL BREATHES IN THE SWAMP

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

TODAY: OLE DAMMEGARD RE LATEST ATTACKS: CLUES & CONNECTIONS

Reports: Israel bombs Syria's Quneitra province

White House Accuses Syria Of Planning Another Chemical Attack, Warns "Will Pay Heavy Price"

=====================================
HOW CAN AMERICANS BE THAT STUPID TROUBLEMAKERS.
IT'S LIKE ACCUSING ASSAD OF NAPALM ATTACK IN VIETNAM.

BRING BACK JOBS TO AMERICA. DESTROY THE REST OF THE WORLD.

THE REST OF THE WORLD IS WAKING AND UNITING AND DON'T BE SURPRISED IF THE AMERICAN CALIGULAS AND THEIR REGIME OF 1871 FACE THE SAME FATE OF THE TROUBLEMAKER KHAZARS


=====================================

Tyler Durden's picture
by Tyler Durden
Jun 27, 2017 7:50 AM
1
TwitterFacebookReddit
Less than three months after the US launched 49 cruise missiles at a Syrian airbase in early April, allegedly in retaliation for a chemical attack conducted by Assad forces, in an ominous statement issued with no supporting evidence or further explanation, on Monday night the White House warned that the U.S. has “identified potential preparations for another chemical weapons attack by the Assad regime” in Syria and warned that Assad would “pay a heavy price” if one took place.

Such an attack “would likely result in the mass murder of civilians, including innocent children,” White House (outgoing) spokesman Sean Spicer added, noting the activity is “similar to preparations the regime made before its April 4, 2017 chemical weapons attack.”

“As we have previously stated, the United States is in Syria to eliminate the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. If, however, Mr. Assad conducts another mass murder attack using chemical weapons, he and his military will pay a heavy price,” the White House added on Monday night.

According to AP, a non-governmental source with close ties to the White House said the administration had received intelligence that the Syrians were mixing precursor chemicals for a possible sarin gas attack in either the east of south of the country, where government troops and their proxies have faced recent setbacks.

Further quoted by AP, several State Department officials typically involved in coordinating such announcements said they were caught completely off guard by the warning, which didn't appear to be discussed in advance with other national security agencies, perhaps an indication of just how powerful the Deep State has become under Trump. Typically, the State Department, the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence agencies would all be consulted before the White House issued a declaration sure to ricochet across foreign capitals.



As a reminder, the justification for Trump's strike on the Shayrat airfield in Syria in April was to retaliate for what the White House said was a poison gas attack by Assad's government that killed at least 70 people in rebel-held territory. Syria denied it carried out the attack. Overnight, however, a new article by Pulitzer winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh (in a German newspaper of all places) has again accused the US of lying about Syria's chemical weapons, and claims that the US bombed Syria in what was the latest attempt to "rally around the flag" and distract from Trump's ongoing domestic scandals.

Predictably, the White House has provided no immediate evidence to back up its claims, however in a media world that is desperate for clicks, we doubt many will demand proof this time, unlike the April strike, when Russia requested a broad UN inquiry into whether Assad indeed used chemical weapons, in which the US has declined to participate for obvious reasons.

April's strike put Washington in confrontation with Russia, which has advisers in Syria aiding its close ally Assad. US officials at the time called the intervention a "one-off" intended to deter future chemical weapons attacks and not an expansion of the U.S. role in the Syrian war. The United States has taken a series of actions over the past three months demonstrating its willingness to carry out strikes, mostly in self-defense, against Syrian government forces and their backers, including Iran.

And, as if expressly intending to further deteriorate already abysmal relations with Russia, shortly after the White House statement, the US ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said on Twitter: "Any further attacks done to the people of Syria will be blamed on Assad, but also on Russia and Iran who support him killing his own people."

Follow
Nikki Haley ✔ @nikkihaley
Any further attacks done to the people of Syria will be blamed on Assad, but also on Russia & Iran who support him killing his own people.
11:36 PM - 26 Jun 2017
2,365 2,365 Retweets 4,687 4,687 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Since the April military strike, Washington has repeatedly struck Iranian-backed militia and even shot down a drone threatening U.S.-led coalition forces. The U.S. military also shot down a Syrian jet earlier this month. Trump has also ordered stepped-up military operations against the Islamic State militant group and delegated more authority to his generals.

So far Russia has refused to respond in deed to repeated US provocations over Syria.

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Истребитель Су-27 отгоняет F-16 НАТО от самолета Шойгу: эксклюзивные кадры

A day after a Russian fighter allegedly flew within 5 feet of a US reconnaissance plane traveling over the Baltic Sea, Reuters reports that a NATO F-16 fighter jet returned the favor when it tried to improperly approach a plane carrying the Russian defense minister. The plane was traveling to the city of Kaliningrad, a Russian enclave along the Baltic coast, where Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu was scheduled to discuss security issues with defense officials on Wednesday. The NATO aircraft was warded off by a Russian Su-27 jet, according to RT.

In an accounting of the incident, Reuters notes that one of the Russian fighter jets escorting Shoigu's plane had inserted itself between the defense minister's plane and the NATO fighter and "tilted its wings from side to side to show the weapons it was carrying, Russian agencies said." After that the F-16 promptly left the area.
A clip of the encounter was caught on tape by Russian journalists:


Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that he has no information about the incident.
“It’s probably better to ask the Defense Ministry,” Peskov said in answer to journalists’ questions.
The latest provocative maneuver represents yet another escalation of tensions between the US and Russia. On Monday, Russia suspended cooperation with the US in Syria under the "memorandum of incident prevention in Syrian skies", warning that its missile defense would intercept any aircraft traveling in Russia’s area of operation after a US fighter jet shot down a Syrian regime aircraft on Sunday.
Russia slammed the US for shooting down the jet, calling the attack an “act of aggression" and claiming that the move benefited terrorists in the area. The Syrian regime says its jet was pursuing a fleeing ISIS convoy around the time it was shot down.  US officials claimed they tried to contact its Russia counterparts via an established “de-confliction line," though Russia has denied this, saying that if the US had reached out, the incident could’ve been avoided.
A US jet also downed a pro-regime drone on Monday in what Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy described as a “dangerous escalation" of tensions between the US and pro-Syrian regime powers like Iran and Russia.   “I think we’re getting closer and closer to open conflict between Iran and Russia and the American public need to know that we are moving very fast towards what could be another war in the Middle East – something Donald Trump promised he wouldn’t do when he ran for office.”
As RT notes, encounters between US and Russian warplanes over the Baltic are becoming more frequent. A Russian fighter jet intercepted a small group of US warplanes, including Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker military refueling aircraft, two B-1 bombers and one B-52, during a BALTOPS (Baltic Operations) annual training exercise on June 10.

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Iraqi Badr Organization and RGC commander Qassem Soleimani.

No More War for Israel





Oliver Stone: Vladimir Putin is a “very rational man”

Over the years, people have realized that one of the quickest ways to make big bucks is to produce lies and fabrications in books that purport to be historical. And this is what is happening with what I call the anti-Putin industry.

These two should never have met, say NWO agents.

by Jonas E. Alexis


Oliver Stone has brought the whole Neocon house down by saying that Vladimir Putin is “a very rational man.” That certainly is a devastating blow. Even the New York Times has recently admitted that Stone “uses his perspective to challenge neoconservative American triumphalism about the Cold War and its aftermath.”[1]
But CNN has already come out and declared that Stone is “a useful public-relations tool fort the Russian leader.”[2]
Over the past four years or so, Neocon hawks and warmongers have said ad infinitum that Putin is the new Hitler on the block, that he plans to conquer much of the West, that he and his team hacked the DNC, and that he has assassinated his opponents and critics. One book after another have already been written on these lines. Consider the following titles:
Putinism: Russia and Its Future with the West, by Walter Laqueur (2015); Putinism: The Ideology (2013), by Anne Applebaum; Putinism: The Slow Rise of a Radical Right Regime in Russia (2013), by Marcel H. Van Herpen; The New Tsar: The Rise and Reign of Vladimir Putin (2015), by Steven Lee Myers; Winter Is Coming: Why Vladimir Putin and the Enemies of the Free World Must Be Stopped (2015), by Garry Kasparov; The Man Without a Face: The Unlikely Rise of Vladimir Putin (2013), by Masha Gessen; Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia? (2015), Karen Dawisha; Putin’s Wars: The Rise of Russia’s New Imperialism (2014), Marcel H. Van Herpen; The New Cold War: Putin’s Russia and the Threat to the West (2014), Edward Lucas; The Russia-China Axis: The New Cold War and America’s Crisis of Leadership (2014), Douglas E. Schoen and Melik Kaylan; The Evolution Of Putinism: Russia in Transition 1985-2015 (2015), by Glenn-Iain Steinback; Putin and Putinism (2015), edited by Ronald J. Hill and Ottorino Cappelli; Putin’s Propaganda Machine: Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy, by Marcel H. Van Herpen. The list is almost endless.
Over the years, people have realized that one of the quickest ways to make big bucks is to produce lies and fabrications in books that purport to be historical. And this is what is happening with what I call the anti-Putin industry. If you cannot meet your opponent on rational and logical ground, then produce deceptions and lies so that people will never understand the real issue. Listen to this big lie by Jewish writer Garry Kasparov:
“Putin fomented a war in Eastern Ukraine and became the first person to annex sovereign foreign territory by force since Saddam Hussein in Kuwait.”[3]
One needn’t be a student of history or even an intellectual to realize that this statement is generally dumb. But if it is dumb, one may ask, then why did Kasparov write it in a book which presumably purports to convey the truth?
Well, Kasparov, sad to say, is driven by the Neocon or Zionist ideology, which always ignores the crimes committed by the warmongers in America. Kasparov has dismiss the invasion of Iraq by the United States, which is still fresh on everyone’s mind. He doesn’t and cannot tell his readers that the United States has been overthrowing countries in the Middle East and elsewhere from time immemorial.[4]
Throughout his book, Kasparov insinuates that Hussein and Gaddafi were dictators,[5] but Kasparov struggles mightily to defend this essentially Zionist position precisely because Zionism is not a system that is based on practical reason. As my dear friend and colleague Mark Dankof put it during our interview last year, Zionism is based on a
“a politically weaponized canard [and] is an attempt to conceal what I believe the truth to be about the doctrine of Jewish racial supremacist ideology as the philosophical underpinning for land thievery, terrorism, and genocide in Palestine, along with the systematic concealment of the evidence of overwhelming Jewish financial and political support in the United States and Europe for fiat money and central banking; globalist TRADE treaties; Israel’s usurpation of American foreign policy; the overwhelmingly Jewish ownership position in the major media consortiums operating in the West; the amount of Jewish and pro-Israel PAC money routinely buying American Presidential elections and Congressional seats and committee assignments on Capitol Hill; and the provably disproportionate role played by Jewish interests in promoting the Cultural Marxism which has engulfed the United States and Western Europe in my lifetime, especially in the advancement of the LGBT agenda, the abortion industry, the pornography industry, and so forth.”[6]
Kasparov inexorably puts his ideological feet firmly in midair when he says:
“Anyone who says they are still uncertain about Putin’s true nature at this point must be joking, a fool, or tricking us. There is no reason to waste time on jokers or fools, however useful they may be in Putin’s marked deck of cards, but tricksters must be watched carefully. For at least a decade now, those who defend Putin either have something to gain from it or they are dangerously ignorant.”[7]
Should we really waste time on jokers and fools like Kasparov? Kasparov has preposterously said that under Vladimir Putin, Russians are “besieged.” He moved on to say that “The people live in fear.”[8] Complete nonsense. Even Megyn Kelly, of all people, has admitted during her interview with Vladimir Putin that Russians feel that Putin has restored the dignity that Russians once had in the moral and political sphere.
Obviously Kasparov would love Russia to turn into a complete New World Order cell once again. Obviously Putin is making people like Kasparov look bad, and Kasparov and his brethren do not like that. They would love to use NATO to destabilize the country, but that ain’t gonna happen any time soon.
Putin, as Oliver Stone says, is historically sharp. He knew what happened in Iraq. He knew what happened in Afghanistan, and he knew what happened to decent Americans who sacrificed their lives for lies and fabrications in the Middle East. Putin has told Stone that the United States has been baby-sitting terrorist cells such as al-Qaeda for years. He said:
“Al-Qaeda is not the result of our activities. This is the result of activities of our US friends. This all started in the times of the Soviet war in Afghanistan, when the US security services supported different movements of Islamic fundamentalism in their struggle against the Soviet troops in Afghanistan. US side has nurtured both Al-Qaeda and [Osama] bin Laden.”[9]
No serious historian or scholar will contest that point. Putin, like a good observer, saw that the United States set his own trap and fall on it. How? Well, anytime you support terrorist activities, says Putin, then you can be sure that the chicken will come home to roost: “It always happens like this. Our US partners should have been aware of it. It is their fault.”

[1] James Poniewozik, “Oliver Stone’s ‘Putin Interviews’: Flattery, but Little Skepticism,” NY times, June 9, 2017.
[2] Brian Lowry, “’Putin Interviews’ as much about Oliver Stone as Russian leader,” CNN, June 9, 2017.
[3] Garry Kasparov, Winter Is coming: Why Vladimir Putin and the Enemies of the Free World Must be Stopped (New York: Public Affairs, 2015), x.
[4] See for example Stephen Kinzer, Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq (New York: Times Books, 2006); All the Shah’s Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2003 and 2008);
[5] Kasparov, Winter Is coming, 95.
[6] For further studies on most of these issues, see John Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Farrar & Straus, 2007); Paul R. Pillar, Intelligence and U.S. Foreign Policy: Iraq, 9/11, and Misguided Reform (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011); Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993); Murray Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005); Stefan Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004); Benny Morris, The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004); 1948: A History of the First Arab-Israeli War (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009); Ilan Pappé, The Forgotten Palestinians: A History of the Palestinians in Israel (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013); Josh Lambert, Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews, and American Culture (New York: New York: University Press, 2014); Jay A. GertzmanBookleggers and Smuthounds: The Trade in Erotica, 1920-1940 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999); Nathan Abrams, The New Jew in Film: Exploring Jewishness and Judaism in Contemporary Cinema (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2012); E. Michael Jones, Barren Metal: A History of Capitalism as the Conflict Between Labor and Usury (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2014); Andrew J. Bacevich, Breach of Trust: How Americans Failed Their Soldiers and Their Country (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2014); John M. Schuessler, Deceit on the Road to War: Presidents, Politics, and American Democracy (New York: Cornell University Press, 2015).
[7] Kasparov, Winter Is coming, 88.
[8] “Keep up global fight for democracy, says Garry Kasparov,” Newsday, June 7, 2017.
[9] “US nurtured Al-Qaeda & supported terrorists in Chechnya – Putin,” Russia Today, June 13, 2017.