BRITISH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE TO
OVERTHROW TRUMP!. |
THE BRITISH ARE ORDERING TRUMP NOT TO
DECLASSIFY FISA-WARRANT+STEELE DOSSIER FOR THAT WOULD BE CROSSING THE RED LINE.
TRANSLATION: THIS DOSSIER IS CLEAR PROOF
THAT THE BRITISH ARE BEHIND THE OVERTHROW OF TRUMP AS WELL AS PRESIDENTS AROUND THE WORLD, ESPECIALLY IN BRAZIL. |
FIVE
COCK-EYED BACK STABBING COUP PLOTTERS(AUSTRALIA, N.ZEALAND, CANADA, UK AND WASHINGTON DC UNDER THEACT OF 1871) |
Sep
21 2018 14:46:48Q!!mG7VJxZNCI281e05b5ab766f308088eaf1e3ceb….jpg 
Step
1: Read the 1st sentence re: [RR] Step 2: Read the NYT article re: [RR] wear wire Attempts to BAIT POTUS to FIRE to cross RED LINE will FAIL. FISA DECLAS WILL BRING THE HOUSE DOWN. Q
Sep
23 2018 12:36:42Q!!mG7VJxZNCI293
>>281
DECLAS of FISA = [RR] self-incrimination. [RR] in charge of DECLAS. Due to massive CONFLICT OF INTEREST IG HOROWITZ was TASKED to final review [speed]. [PREVENT LEFT 'ENDANGER' SOURCES & METHODS + MUELLER INTERFERENCE NARRATIVE] IT WILL ALL COME OUT. POTUS will not be BAITED TO FIRE when the release itself will FORCE RESIGNATION/TERMINATION [RR]. UK/AUS (+ OTHERS) MUST LEARN THE TRUE DEFINITION OF 'ALLY'. [RR] PREVENTED [FORCE] FROM SIGNING NEW FISA's. ALL SIGNERS ARE CURRENTLY UNDER GJ INVESTIGATION. MCCABE MEMOS [NYT [RR] ARTICLE][PROVE] THE RATS ARE PANICKING. 2018 WILL BE GLORIOUS. PREPARE FOR 'SKY IS FALLING' WEEK. Q
Sep 21 2018
|
ANCIENT
KHAZARIAN ORCHESTRATED FELLONIOUS CHAOS, CHICANERY AND BLACKMAIL, MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO TRACK AND TAKE HOLD OF ANY GIVEN SITUATION BECAUSE IT IS FUNDED BY FREE PRINTING OF PAPER PONZI CURRENCIES! |
BUYBACKS OF NONSENSICAL BOOKS!
|
MILLIONAIRE SPEECHESBY DUNCES !
|
OVER
2-MILLION OF UNDERCOVER DEEP STATE OPERATIVES WORLD-WIDE! |
LAUNDERING BY CROWD FUNDING -
|
THIS CALLS
FOR THE RETURN OF THE GUILLOTINE IN THE FORM OF SEALED INDICTMENTS, AS ONLY MEANS TO DEFEAT THE DEEP STATE AND THE RESTORATION OF RULE BY LAW. |
UK
|
"Lifelong
Friend" Of Kavanaugh Accuser Denies Attending Party Where Alleged Sexual Assault Occurred 
by Tyler
Durden
Sat,
09/22/2018 - 23:07
309
SHARES
A woman
believed to have been one of five people at a party some 35 years ago where Christine Blasey Ford claims she was sexually assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh has become the fourth person to deny any recollection of the event.
In a
Saturday night email to the Senate Judiciary Committee also received by several news outlets, Leland Ingham Keyser - a "longtime friend" of Blasey Ford's said through her attorney:
"Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of
ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford," said Keyser's attorney Howard Walsh, who has been "engaged in the limited capacity" of corresponding with the committee on behalf of Keyser, according to Politico.
Kavanaugh and Mark
Judge - the other teenager allegedly in the room during the alleged sexual assault - have both stated that they have no recollection of the incident, while a third man who Ford claims was at the party - Patrick J. Smyth, also denied any recollection of the event, telling the Judiciary Committee last week in a statement: "I understand that I have been identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as 'PJ' who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to the Washington Post," Smyth wrote in his statement. "I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh."
Smyth
added: "Personally speaking, I have known Brett Kavanaugh since high school and I know him to be a person of great integrity, a great friend, and I have never witnessed any improper conduct by Brett Kavanaugh towards women. To safeguard my own privacy and anonymity, I respectfully request that the Committee accept this statement in response to any inquiry the Committee may have."
On Saturday night, a
tentative deal was reached for Ford to testify publicly on Thursday, according to the New York Times.
After a brief call late on Saturday, the woman’s
lawyers and aides to Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, the Republican chairman of the Judiciary Committee, planned to talk again Sunday morning to continue the halting negotiations over the conditions of the testimony, according to three people familiar with the call. Aides to Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, the committee’s top Democrat, were also involved. -NY Times
The Times notes, however, that Leland Keyser's statement "seemed to eliminate any chance of corroboration of Dr. Blasey’s
account by anyone who attended the high school party where she says she was assaulted."
If no deal
is reached for Blasey Ford's testimony next week, Sen. Grassley will be left to decide on Sunday whether or not to move ahead with a scheduled vote to confirm Kavanaugh on Monday.
Grassley
has engaged in a back-and-forth with Ford's legal team, allowing them to miss several deadlines to continue negotiations. While Grassley may be trying to avoid the appearance of the Judiciary Committee panel of 11 men bullying an female victim alleging sexual assault, many conservatives have expressed frustration at the Chairman's acquiescence to virtually every demand Ford has made.  
Shut this down.
Everyone at the party has said they have no idea what Christine Blasey Ford is talking about, even her longtime friend Leland Ingham Keyser! What are you waiting for Chuck!!! Vote on Monday!!! #ConfirmKavanaugh
· 7h
4 witnesses (one of Ford’s longtime
friends)support Brett Kavanaugh vs Christine Blasey Ford. Time to end this and move on. #ConfirmBrettKavanaugh
The Senate should be
negotiating with Ford for a written apology from her to Brett Kavanaugh and his wife and children.
Also potentially damaging
to Blasey Ford's claim is a theory presented Thursday by Ed Whelan, a former clerk to USSC Justice Antonin Scalia and currently president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), a conservative think tank. Using entirely circumstantial evidence which could certainly ruin the life of the man at the center of the new theory, Whelan suggested that Kavanaugh's high school doppelgänger, Chris Garrett, may have in fact been responsible for Blasey Ford's recollection of the alleged incident.
Brett Kavanaugh (left)
|
He's totally harmless.
Why
|
The
"Resistance" Supports Trump's 'Evil Agendas' While Attacking Fake Nonsense
by Tyler Durden
Sat, 09/22/2018 - 20:30
75
SHARES
A new article from the Wall Street Journal reports that
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo lied to congress about the measures Saudi Arabia is taking to minimize the civilian casualties in its catastrophic war on Yemen, and that he did so in order to secure two billion dollars for war profiteers.
This is
about as depraved as anything you could possibly imagine. US-made bombs have been conclusively tied to civilian deaths in a war which has caused the single worst humanitarian crisis on earth, a crisis which sees scores of Yemeni children dying every single day and has placed five million children at risk of death by starvation in a nation where families are now eating leaves to survive. CIA veteran Bruce Riedel once said that “if the United States of America and the United Kingdom tonight told King Salman that this war has to end, it would end tomorrow, because the Royal Saudi Airforce cannot operate without American and British support.” Nobody other than war plutocrats benefits from the US assisting Saudi Arabia in its monstrous crimes against humanity, and yet Pompeo chose to override his own expert advisors on the matter for fear of hurting the income of those very war plutocrats.
If the
so-called “Resistance” to Trump was ever actually interested in opposing this administration in any meaningful way, this would be the top trending news story in America for days, like how “bombshell” revelations pertaining to the made-up Russiagate narrative trend for days. Spoiler alert: it isn’t, and it won’t be. 
Starving children are
being forced to eat leaves in a desperate bid for survival, as conditions in Yemen become a ‘living hell’.
It would be
so very, very easy for Democratic party leaders and Democrat-aligned media to hurt this administration at the highest level and cause irreparable political damage based on this story. All they’d have to do is give it the same blanket coverage they’ve given the stories about Michael Flynn, George Papadopoulos and Paul Manafort which end up leading nowhere remotely near impeachment or proof of collusion with the Russian government. The footage of the starving children is right there, ready to be aired to pluck at the heart strings of rank-and-file Americans day after day until Republicans have lost all hope of victory in the midterms and in 2020; all they’d have to do is use it. But they don’t. And they won’t.
The US
Senate has just passed Trump’s mammoth military spending increase by a landslide 92–8 vote. The eight senators who voted “nay”? Seven Republicans, and Independent Bernie Sanders. Every single Democrat supported the most bloated war budget since the height of the Iraq war. Rather than doing everything they can to weaken the potential damage that can be done by a president they’ve been assuring us is a dangerous hybrid of equal parts Benedict Arnold and Adolf Hitler, they’ve been actively increasing his power as Commander-in-Chief of the most powerful military force the world has ever seen.
The reason for this is
very simple: President Trump’s ostensible political opposition does not oppose President Trump. They’re on the same team, wearing different uniforms. This is the reason they attack him on Russian collusion accusations which the brighter bulbs among them know full well will never be proven and have no basis in reality. They don’t stand up to Trump because, as Julian Assange once said, they are Trump. 
Stand up to Trump? They
are Trump. https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/938294405408096262 …
In John Steinbeck’s The Pearl, there are jewelry buyers set up around a
fishing community which are all owned by the same plutocrat, but they all pretend to be in competition with one another. When the story’s protagonist discovers an enormous and valuable pearl and goes to sell it, they all gather round and individually bid far less than it is worth in order to trick him into giving it away for almost nothing. US politics is pretty much the same; two mainstream parties owned by the same political class, engaged in a staged bidding war for votes to give the illusion of competition.
In reality,
the US political system is like the unplugged video game remote that kids give their baby brother so he stops whining that he wants a turn to play. No matter who they vote for they get an Orwellian warmongering government which exists solely to advance the agendas of a plutocratic class which has no loyalties to any nation; the only difference is sometimes that government is pretending to care about women and minorities and sometimes it’s pretending to care about white men. In reality, all the jewelers work for the same plutocrat, and that video game remote won’t impact the outcome of the game no matter how many buttons you push.
The only
way to effect real change is to stop playing along with the rigged system and start waking people up to the lies. As long as Americans believe that the mass media are telling them the truth about their country and their partisan votes are going somewhere useful, the populace whose numbers should give it immense influence is nullified and sedated into a passive ride toward war, ecocide and oppression. If enough of us keep throwing sand in the gears of the lie factory, we can wake the masses up from the oligarchic lullaby they’re being sung. And then maybe we’ll be big enough to have a shot at grabbing one of the real video game controllers.
*
* *
Thanks for
reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my website, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, checking out mypodcast, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, buying my new book Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone, or my previous book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.
Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2 |
Was
NYT Story About Rosenstein 'Coup Attempt' A Setup?
by Tyler Durden
Sat,
09/22/2018 - 19:00
50
SHARES
Is the FBI
trying to goad President Trump into firing the man in charge of supervising the Mueller probe? That's what Sean Hannity and a handful of Trump's Congressional allies think.
According
to a report in Politico, Republicans in Congress are approaching a story about Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein attempting to organize a palace coup with extreme caution, despite having twice nearly gathered the votes to remove him in the recent past.
On Friday, the NYT reported a bombshell story
alleging that Rosenstein had tried to recruit administration officials to secretly tape conversations with the president in order to help justify removing Trump under the 25th amendment. Rosenstein vehemently denied the story, which was largely based on confidential memos written by former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe. And others who were reportedly in attendance at meeting between McCabe and Rosenstein said the Deputy AG was being "sarcastic" when he suggested that the president be taped.
Meanwhile, Trump allies
including Ohio Congressman Jim Jordan and Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz are saying that the story should be treated with suspicion. Jordan and Freedom Caucus leader Mark Meadows once filed articles of impeachment against Rosenstein. But now, both Meadows and Jordan intend to proceed with caution, telling Politico that he would like to see the memos that the story was based on.
House
Freedom Caucus leaders Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan, who led a charge to impeach Rosenstein this summer, have said they want to hear from Rosenstein and see documents allegedly describing the comments before they decide what to do. That’s awarded Rosenstein a courtesy they’ve never given him in the past.
"I
think Rod needs to come before Congress this week and explain under oath what exactly he said and didn't say," Meadows said at the Values Voters Summit Saturday.
The
newfound hesitation to oust Rosenstein highlights a cautious approach Trump allies have adopted as the Republican party barrels toward a potential bloodbath in the midterms. Some Republicans fear Trump firing Rosenstein now would only further energize Democrats making the case to voters that the president is corrupt and needs to be reined in by a Democratic House.
[...]
In a Friday
interview, Jordan, one of Rosenstein's fiercest critics in Congress, sidestepped questions about whether the House should revisit Rosenstein’s impeachment or try to hold him in contempt of Congress. Rather, he said, a more focused push to obtain sensitive documents from the Justice Department — which Trump's allies say would expose anti-Trump bias and corruption the FBI — is the most urgent priority.
"I want to see those
memos and evaluate them," said Jordan, who has clashed publicly with Rosenstein over access to documents and accused him of threatening House Intelligence Committee staffers, an allegation Rosenstein denied.
Politico cites two possible explanations for lawmakers' hesitation: Republicans are
running out of time before members devote themselves full-time to their reelection campaigns. Republicans are worried that the story could have been intentionally planted to provoke Rosenstein's firing in order to improve Democrats' chances of retaking the Senate AND the House (Trump actively moving to crush the Mueller probe would be quite the propaganda win for the Dems).
Sean
Hannity took this latter theory a step further during his show on Friday evening, where he urged Trump not to fire Rosie and instead insisted that the story could have been a "trap". He added that he had been told by "multiple sources" that the story was planted by unspecified "enemies of Trump."
"I have a message
for the president tonight," Hannity said Friday night. "Under zero circumstances should the president fire anybody...the president needs to know it is all a setup."
Still, a handful of
conservative commentators, including Laura Ingraham, urged Trump to fire Rosenstein immediately. And for Trump's part, he hinted at a rally Friday night in Missouri that he planned to "get rid" of the "lingering stench" at the DOJ, which many interpreted as a hint that his firing is imminent. |
Just
Two NY Times Paragraphs On Russiagate - A Striking Admission
by Tyler Durden
Sat,
09/22/2018 - 18:00
291
SHARES
This week The New York Times published an epic 10,000 word piece entitled
"The Plot to Subvert and Election - Unraveling the Russia Story So Far."
It's essentially
the Times' summary of everything that can be definitively established thus far after two years of national obsession and inquiry into alleged Russian election meddling and influence that supposedly ushered Trump into the White House in 2016.
The massive investigative piece has the following
lede at the top: For two years, Americans have tried to absorb the details of the 2016 attack — hacked emails, social media fraud, suspected spies — and President Trump’s claims that it’s all a hoax. The Times explores what we know and what it means.
But what do we
learn? Buried among the nearly 200 paragraphs of seemingly endless intelligence "claims" wherein the reader will be disappointed to find no smoking gun detailing any actual conspiracy of meddling and collusion, we find two specific paragraphs — which though contradictory — are incredibly revealing about the nature of the whole 'Russiagate' scandal.
First, in paragraph 5 we
are told by the Times journalists:
President Trump’s Twitter outbursts that it is
all a “hoax” and a “witch hunt,” in the face of a mountain of evidence to the contrary, have taken a toll on public comprehension. 
And as Moon of Alabama blog astutely observes,
after one-hundred-and-seventy-eight paragraphs featuring repetition of "unproven intelligence claims, spin around a few facts and lots of innuendo" the same authors finally admit that Trump is actually right.
Near the end of an
exhaustively long piece meant to chronicle the "evidence" that few are likely to ever read in full, we find this bombshell candid admission:
Mr. Trump’s frustration with the Russian
investigation is not surprising. He is right that no public evidence has emerged showing that his campaign conspired with Russia in the election interference or accepted Russian money. 
In an astounding
contradiction within a single NYT article, the "mountain of evidence" at the opening becomes Trump "is right that no public evidence has emerged" by the story's closing.
Enough
said?...
That's right, after two
years of almost 24/7 media coverage and frenzy over the Trump campaign and White House supposedly being under a perpetual Kremlin shadow of compromise, we have a 10,000 word piece by the "paper of record" attempting to tie all the "evidence" together which ultimately ends on a whimper.  
Buried in this 10k-word
NYT piece: "no public evidence has emerged showing that [Trump's] campaign conspired with Russia." This is a pattern: ample words for Trump-Russia innuendo; quiet acknowledgment of no evidence. And 0 words on what has been debunked. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/09/20/us/politics/russia-interference-election-trump-clinton.html …
Again, The Times began by citing "a mountain of evidence"
in paragraph 5, but ends with: "Mr. Trump’s frustration with the Russian investigation is not surprising. He is right that no public evidence has emerged..."
Journalist Aaron Maté rightly concludes, "This is a pattern:
ample words for Trump-Russia innuendo; quiet acknowledgment of no evidence. And 0 words on what has been debunked." |
No comments:
Post a Comment