ECONOMICAL+PANDEMICAL+DECLASS-ATTEMPTED COUP. THE BRITISH ROGUE EMPIRE STILL BREATHES IN THE SWAMP

Tuesday, October 30, 2018

Thursday, October 18, 2018

Federal Judge "Shocked" To Find Obama State Dept Lied To Protect Hillary From Email Server Lawsuits

Federal Judge "Shocked" To Find Obama State Dept Lied To Protect Hillary From Email Server Lawsuits

The noose appears to be tightening further around the law-less behaviors of the Obama administration in their frantic efforts to protect former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from lawsuits seeking information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
As Fox News reports, the transparency group Judicial Watch initially sued the State Department in 2014, seeking information about the response to the Benghazi attack after the government didn't respond to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. Other parallel lawsuits by Judicial Watch are probing issues like Clinton's server, whose existence was revealed during the course of the litigation.
The State Department had immediately moved to dismiss Judicial Watch's first lawsuit, but U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth (who was appointed to the bench by President Ronald Reagan) denied the request to dismiss the lawsuit at the time, and on Friday, he said he was happy he did, charging that State Department officials had intentionally misled him because other key documents, including those on Clinton's email server, had not in fact been produced.
"It was clear to me that at the time that I ruled initially, that false statements were made to me by career State Department officials, and it became more clear through discovery that the information that I was provided was clearly false regarding the adequacy of the search and this – what we now know turned out to be the Secretary’s email system."
"I don’t know the details of what kind of IG inquiry there was into why these career officials at the State Department would have filed false affidavits with me. I don’t know the details of why the Justice Department lawyers did not know false affidavits were being filed with me, but I was very relieved that I did not accept them and that I allowed limited discovery into what had happened."
In a somewhat stunningly frank exchange with Justice Department lawyer Robert Prince, the judge pressed the issue, accusing Prince of using "doublespeak" and "playing the same word games [Clinton] played."
That "was not true," the judge said, referring to the State Department's assurances in a sworn declaration that it had searched all relevant documents.
"It was a lie."
Additionally,  Fox notes that Judge Lamberth said he was "shocked" and "dumbfounded" when he learned that FBI had granted immunity to former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Mills during its investigation into the use of Clinton's server, according to a court transcript of his remarks.
"I had myself found that Cheryl Mills had committed perjury and lied under oath in a published opinion I had issued in a Judicial Watch case where I found her unworthy of belief, and I was quite shocked to find out she had been given immunity in — by the Justice Department in the Hillary Clinton email case."
On Friday, Lamberth said he did not know Mills had been granted immunity until he "read the IG report and learned that and that she had accompanied [Clinton] to her interview."

Tom Fitton on CBN: 3.5 MILLION 'Ghost Voters' on Voter Rolls--'That's wh...



‘Shocked’ Federal Judge Slams State Department For Providing False Statements on Clinton Email Server

A federal judge accused State Department officials of lying and signing “clearly false” affidavits in an attempt to prevent watchdog groups from attaining information on Hillary Clinton’s private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi.

court transcript from Friday’s hearing – involving a lawsuit brought by the watchdog group Judicial Watch – reveals U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth noting certain elements of the department’s attempts to derail the case had left him “shocked” and “dumbfounded.”

The State Department sought to get the lawsuit thrown out during a previous hearing, but Lamberth denied the request. On Friday, he reminded them in a scathing statement that he had made the correct decision.

In particular, the judge blasted officials for claiming they had searched all relevant documents pertaining to the Clinton server.

“It was a lie,” Lamberth said.

False Statements

“It was clear to me that at the time that I ruled initially, that false statements were made to me by career State Department officials,” the judge railed.

“And it became more clear through discovery that the information that I was provided was clearly false regarding the adequacy of the search and this – what we now know turned out to be the Secretary’s email system.”



Justice Department lawyers countered that the judge could make an argument that the search was not adequate, but their declaration that it was did not amount to a lie because hey, they tried.

Angered By Immunity For Clinton’s Chief of Staff

Another aspect of Judge Lamberth’s dismay involved the immunity granted to Clinton’s former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills. Mills herself was a “subject” in the FBI’s investigation of Clinton’s server and was found to have classified information on her laptop.

“I was actually dumbfounded when I found out … that Cheryl Mills had been given immunity,” Lamberth stated.

“I had myself found that Cheryl Mills had committed perjury,” he said, “and lied under oath in a published opinion I had issued in a Judicial Watch case where I found her unworthy of belief.”

Lamberth noted the Inspector General report from Michael Horowitz which revealed Mills had also been allowed to sit through the FBI’s interview of Clinton, a shocking breach of protocol.

Judicial Watch Response

In the wake of Friday’s hearing, Judicial Watch responded with fire and fury over the State Department’s seeming cover-up in both their email server and Benghazi document lawsuits.

“President Trump should ask why his State Department is still refusing to answer basic questions about the Clinton email scandal,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “Hillary Clinton’s and the State Department’s email cover-up abused the FOIA, the courts, and the American people’s right to know.”

As part of their lawsuit, Fitton’s group is trying to compel Clinton and other top aides to testify as a means to gather more information.

Hillary – Lawsuits, Investigations Upended Her 2016 Campaign

Mrs. Clinton, among many, many, many other things, blamed Republicans and watchdog groups like Judicial Watch for her loss in the 2016 presidential election.

“Boy, it was turned into a political football,” she moaned. “And it was aimed at undermining my credibility, my record, my accomplishments.”

How does one undermine things you clearly don’t possess?
The Benghazi scandal and subsequent investigations weren’t a political football – they were a necessary means to finding out the truth behind a terrorist attack that killed four Americans on Clinton’s watch as Secretary of State. It was a means to find out why they covered up what happened, and why they lied to the American people as a means to protect Barack Obama.

Those lies and the cover-up continues to this day. Thank God groups like Judicial Watch continue to fight, and that at least one federal judge is exposing the corruption in the State and Justice Departments even now.

NEW--FBI Didn't Look at Clinton/Abedin Emails Found on Anthony Weiner's ...



‘Shocked’ Federal Judge Slams State Department For Providing False Statements on Clinton Email Server

A federal judge accused State Department officials of lying and signing “clearly false” affidavits in an attempt to prevent watchdog groups from attaining information on Hillary Clinton’s private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi.

court transcript from Friday’s hearing – involving a lawsuit brought by the watchdog group Judicial Watch – reveals U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth noting certain elements of the department’s attempts to derail the case had left him “shocked” and “dumbfounded.”

The State Department sought to get the lawsuit thrown out during a previous hearing, but Lamberth denied the request. On Friday, he reminded them in a scathing statement that he had made the correct decision.

In particular, the judge blasted officials for claiming they had searched all relevant documents pertaining to the Clinton server.

“It was a lie,” Lamberth said.

False Statements

“It was clear to me that at the time that I ruled initially, that false statements were made to me by career State Department officials,” the judge railed.

“And it became more clear through discovery that the information that I was provided was clearly false regarding the adequacy of the search and this – what we now know turned out to be the Secretary’s email system.”



Justice Department lawyers countered that the judge could make an argument that the search was not adequate, but their declaration that it was did not amount to a lie because hey, they tried.

Angered By Immunity For Clinton’s Chief of Staff

Another aspect of Judge Lamberth’s dismay involved the immunity granted to Clinton’s former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills. Mills herself was a “subject” in the FBI’s investigation of Clinton’s server and was found to have classified information on her laptop.

“I was actually dumbfounded when I found out … that Cheryl Mills had been given immunity,” Lamberth stated.

“I had myself found that Cheryl Mills had committed perjury,” he said, “and lied under oath in a published opinion I had issued in a Judicial Watch case where I found her unworthy of belief.”

Lamberth noted the Inspector General report from Michael Horowitz which revealed Mills had also been allowed to sit through the FBI’s interview of Clinton, a shocking breach of protocol.

Judicial Watch Response

In the wake of Friday’s hearing, Judicial Watch responded with fire and fury over the State Department’s seeming cover-up in both their email server and Benghazi document lawsuits.

“President Trump should ask why his State Department is still refusing to answer basic questions about the Clinton email scandal,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “Hillary Clinton’s and the State Department’s email cover-up abused the FOIA, the courts, and the American people’s right to know.”

As part of their lawsuit, Fitton’s group is trying to compel Clinton and other top aides to testify as a means to gather more information.

Hillary – Lawsuits, Investigations Upended Her 2016 Campaign

Mrs. Clinton, among many, many, many other things, blamed Republicans and watchdog groups like Judicial Watch for her loss in the 2016 presidential election.

“Boy, it was turned into a political football,” she moaned. “And it was aimed at undermining my credibility, my record, my accomplishments.”

How does one undermine things you clearly don’t possess?
The Benghazi scandal and subsequent investigations weren’t a political football – they were a necessary means to finding out the truth behind a terrorist attack that killed four Americans on Clinton’s watch as Secretary of State. It was a means to find out why they covered up what happened, and why they lied to the American people as a means to protect Barack Obama.

Those lies and the cover-up continues to this day. Thank God groups like Judicial Watch continue to fight, and that at least one federal judge is exposing the corruption in the State and Justice Departments even now.

Tom Fitton on WMAL: Federal Court SLAMS Deep State Dishonesty on Clinton...



‘Shocked’ Federal Judge Slams State Department For Providing False Statements on Clinton Email Server

A federal judge accused State Department officials of lying and signing “clearly false” affidavits in an attempt to prevent watchdog groups from attaining information on Hillary Clinton’s private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi.

court transcript from Friday’s hearing – involving a lawsuit brought by the watchdog group Judicial Watch – reveals U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth noting certain elements of the department’s attempts to derail the case had left him “shocked” and “dumbfounded.”

The State Department sought to get the lawsuit thrown out during a previous hearing, but Lamberth denied the request. On Friday, he reminded them in a scathing statement that he had made the correct decision.

In particular, the judge blasted officials for claiming they had searched all relevant documents pertaining to the Clinton server.

“It was a lie,” Lamberth said.

False Statements

“It was clear to me that at the time that I ruled initially, that false statements were made to me by career State Department officials,” the judge railed.

“And it became more clear through discovery that the information that I was provided was clearly false regarding the adequacy of the search and this – what we now know turned out to be the Secretary’s email system.”



Justice Department lawyers countered that the judge could make an argument that the search was not adequate, but their declaration that it was did not amount to a lie because hey, they tried.

Angered By Immunity For Clinton’s Chief of Staff

Another aspect of Judge Lamberth’s dismay involved the immunity granted to Clinton’s former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills. Mills herself was a “subject” in the FBI’s investigation of Clinton’s server and was found to have classified information on her laptop.

“I was actually dumbfounded when I found out … that Cheryl Mills had been given immunity,” Lamberth stated.

“I had myself found that Cheryl Mills had committed perjury,” he said, “and lied under oath in a published opinion I had issued in a Judicial Watch case where I found her unworthy of belief.”

Lamberth noted the Inspector General report from Michael Horowitz which revealed Mills had also been allowed to sit through the FBI’s interview of Clinton, a shocking breach of protocol.

Judicial Watch Response

In the wake of Friday’s hearing, Judicial Watch responded with fire and fury over the State Department’s seeming cover-up in both their email server and Benghazi document lawsuits.

“President Trump should ask why his State Department is still refusing to answer basic questions about the Clinton email scandal,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “Hillary Clinton’s and the State Department’s email cover-up abused the FOIA, the courts, and the American people’s right to know.”

As part of their lawsuit, Fitton’s group is trying to compel Clinton and other top aides to testify as a means to gather more information.

Hillary – Lawsuits, Investigations Upended Her 2016 Campaign

Mrs. Clinton, among many, many, many other things, blamed Republicans and watchdog groups like Judicial Watch for her loss in the 2016 presidential election.

“Boy, it was turned into a political football,” she moaned. “And it was aimed at undermining my credibility, my record, my accomplishments.”

How does one undermine things you clearly don’t possess?
The Benghazi scandal and subsequent investigations weren’t a political football – they were a necessary means to finding out the truth behind a terrorist attack that killed four Americans on Clinton’s watch as Secretary of State. It was a means to find out why they covered up what happened, and why they lied to the American people as a means to protect Barack Obama.

Those lies and the cover-up continues to this day. Thank God groups like Judicial Watch continue to fight, and that at least one federal judge is exposing the corruption in the State and Justice Departments even now.