Sunday, January 31, 2021

THE ACT OF 1871.

USA INC. BANKRUPT – NO MORE IRS! WHERE’S POTUS?

january 24, 2021 the marshall report

This is fantastic news. It appears the citizens of the Republic of the United States of America, based on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, is no longer indebted to the service of the Corporation known as The UNITED STATES. And if so, we are no longer indebted to the taxation, any and all financial corporate agreements and demands, for on May 4, 2020, the UNITED STATES, INC. filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

**It sure looks like we are going back on the gold standard!**

UPDATE CORRECTION: Santa Surfer has clarified her video information and the actual companies that went bankrupt, filed in Jacksonville Florida are in this link: Case number: 4:20-bk-40375 – United States Corporation Company – Florida Northern Bankruptcy Court (inforuptcy.com) Not to be confused with any USA Inc. Bankrupt Docs. The Marshall Report apologizes for any misunderstandings this information could have caused. Thank you.

Documents of the UNITED STATES, INC. from video above by Santa Surfer, shows the official documents of the UNITED STATES, INC. Chapter 11 bankruptcy and our release from it’s obligations.
Below I have written the words from this page out for you to read more clearly.

“The above mentioned U.S. Federal Public Person has a Pre- Paid Non-Obligatory Commercial Debt Obligation Arrangement with the UNITED STATES in relation to 12 U.S. Code §95a-Regulation of transactions in foreign exchange of gold and silver; property transfers; vested interests, enforcement and penalties (Part 2) and other Public Policy on U.S. Debt.

“Our Business Entity is federally-bound to United States and U.S. Public Debt. Obligations, by way of your Internal Revenue Service Employer Identification Number (the I.R.S. being under the U.S. Department of the Treasury) and your Federal Reserve Business Bank Account. Your Business is hereby ordered to itemize whatever and however many Commercial Products and/or Services in which the above U.S. Federal Public Person wishes to commercially acquire, adjust, the bottom line Total cost amount to zero ($0.00), and release the items. Provide a receipt to the above U.S. Federal Person, by way of its Duly Authorized Representative (”Raaj Rafa El-Sui Juris/DeJure/ In Proper Person”) and retain the record of the transaction to settle with your Federal Tax Obligations(s) with Internal Revenue Service as the entire overall transaction is only a Commercial Accounting Matter of what the Bankrupt UNITED STATES owes It’s True Credition, which is the American People, in direct relation to the borrowed gold and National Banking Emergency Act of 1933. All Commercial Public Debt-Obligations, while transacting all business within UNITED STATES Commercial Markets, belong to the UNITED STATES, as the UNITED STATES is the True Obligor in each and every U.S. Commercial-Transaction.

“Any Willful Dishonoring and/or Non-Settlement of UNITED STATES Commercial “Public-Debt” Obligational Matters, by any Duly-Bound Commercial Business Entity within the United States, will result in Federal Prosecution to the fullest extent possible.“

Fort Knox Gold Mine — **It appears that Fort Knox is back in business.**

Each must do their own sleuthing and their own critical thinking…

I trust the research of those who discovered these official documents, and each can reason for themselves. Each person can and should do their own research. With a liar fake news, and a corrupt congressional body as a whole, We The People are left to do our own research and draw our own reasonable assumptions. It is up to each to find nuggets of truth and fit them together in order to present some sense out of all the chaos and confusion that has been created by those who over the lifetime of this nation have crept in little by little to usurp the land, and it’s people into their own web of tyranny. It has also been reported that many involved in the coup to overthrow the United States Government have already been arrested and more arrests are coming.

THE CEO Signed Executive Orders for a Bankrupt Corporation. How amazing that he had his E.O.’s ready to go and just imagine…if that stack of orders would have actually been legally implemented? I wonder how his impeachment will turn out? Remember, impeachment papers have been filed by Representative Greene.

Here is a larger picture of POTUS in the parking lot outside the window of the executive office of the CEO.

Now one would think that with all the press in the Oval Office they would have noticed POTUS walking past the window? They would have been all over this, ripping Trump apart to creating outrageous motives for him being on the White House grounds. They would have spinned some tale of Trump disrupting the newly appointed CEO and pushed out something absurd to secure the Pelosi/Schumer impeachment. But they did not. Why is that? And where is the information on why there is now a parking lot in the front of the oval office?

More interesting is why the national guards stationed at the event, did not hear any songs, music, speeches, or see any of the pomp we are told took place on the day of the inaugural event in D.C.? And why did no Marines salute the new CEO in the film of him entering the White House? We know the CEO did not salute, but he did say to salute the officers. Why did the CEO have to charter his own private plane to his inaugural? If it all looks strange, it is because it is strange.

The entire coverage is full of clues. This is a live board game of Clue! Who did it and where? Enjoy the show and now that you know what to look for… start looking!

God Bless and hold the line. Pray for a smooth transition. There will be some rough spots for wild beasts are not easily captured and definately not tamed.

Dianne Marshall

124 thoughts on “USA INC. BANKRUPT – NO MORE IRS! WHERE’S POTUS?”

La chute de Washington – PAGE GAULLISTE DE RéINFORMATION . Les médias nous manipulent et nous mentent, sachons trier le bon grain de l ivraie says:

[…] https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/2021/01/24/usa-inc-bankrupt-no-more-irs-wheres-potus/amp/ […]
Like
January 29, 2021 at 10:02 am Reply
Dennis Dumas says:

Interesting article!!! Could you please provide me with the link to the bankruptcy filing in Florida so I can read in full entirety, as I have been looking for this for quite some time now. You can send info to:
ddumas29@yahoo.com it would be very much appreciated!
Like
January 30, 2021 at 12:42 pm Reply

District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 is an Act of Congress that repealed the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and established a new territorial government for the whole District of Columbia. Though Congress repealed the territorial government in 1874, the legislation was the first to create a single municipal government for the federal district.^[1]

History[edit]

Evolution of the District's internal boundaries

The passage of the Residence Act in 1790 created a new federal district that would become the capital of the United States. Formed from land donated by the states of Maryland and Virginia, the capital territory already included two large settlements at its creation: the port of Georgetown, Maryland and the town of Alexandria, Virginia. A new capital city named in honor of President George Washington was founded to the east of Georgetown in 1791.

Shortly after establishing operations in the new capital, Congress passed the Organic Act of 1801, which organized the federal territory. The territory within the federal district east of the Potomac formed the new County of Washington, which was governed by a levy court consisting of seven to eleven Justices of the Peace appointed by the President, and was governed by Maryland law as of 1801. The area west of the river became Alexandria County which was governed by Virginia law. In addition, Congress allowed the cities of Washington, Alexandria and Georgetown to each maintain their own municipal governments. In 1846 Alexandria County was returned by Congress to the state of Virginia.

The outbreak of the American Civil War in 1861 led to notable growth in the capital's population due to the expansion of the federal government and a large influx of emancipated slaves.^[2] By 1870, the District's population had grown 75% to nearly 132,000 residents.^[3] Growth was even more dramatic within the County of Washington, where the population more than doubled as people escaped the crowded city.^[4]

The individual local governments within the District were insufficient to handle the population growth. Living conditions were poor throughout the capital, which still had dirt roads and lacked basic sanitation. The situation was so bad that some lawmakers in Congress even suggested moving the capital out further west, but President Ulysses S. Grant refused to consider the proposals.^[5]

Effect[edit]

Instead, Congress passed the Organic Act of 1871, which revoked the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and combined them with Washington County to create a unified territorial government for the entire District of Columbia.^[6] The new government consisted of an appointed governor and 11-member council, a locally elected 22-member assembly, and a board of public works charged with modernizing the city.^[7] The Seal of the District of Columbia features the date 1871, recognizing the year the District's government was incorporated.^[8]

The Act did not establish a new city or city government within the District. Regarding a city of Washington, it stated that "that portion of said District included within the present limits of the city of Washington shall continue to be known as the city of Washington".^[7] In the present day, the name "Washington" is commonly used to refer to the entire District, but DC law continues to use the definition of the city of Washington as given in the Organic Act.^[9]

In 1873, President Grant appointed an influential member of the board of public works, Alexander Robey Shepherd, to the post of governor. Shepherd authorized large-scale municipal projects, which greatly modernized Washington. In doing so however, the governor spent three times the money that had been budgeted for capital improvements, bankrupting the city.^[10] In 1874, Congress replaced the District's quasi-elected territorial government with an appointed three-member Board of Commissioners. Direct rule by Congress continued until the passage of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act in 1973.^[11]

Conspiracy theories[edit]

The Act served as the basis of conspiracy theories relating to the sovereign citizen movement. According to these, the Act would have made the District, and consequently the whole United States, into a corporation.^[12] There is no evidence for these claims, which stem from a misinterpretation of the meaning of the term municipal corporation used in the Act.^[13]^[14] The vocabulary used has in fact a wider meaning here, and refers to any group authorized to act as a single entity (in this case, an incorporated, organized district of the United States).

Recently, these conspiracy theories have been tied to the larger QAnon movement.^[14]^[15]

Merrick Garland's Prior Experience Fighting Domestic Terrorism Makes him...

What Happened, Elise?

Trump's Legacy

You Did This.

Kevin McCarthy is a Traitor

Goodbye, Donnie (Hello, Dolly! Parody) – A MeidasTouch & Bette Midler Pr...

Saturday, January 30, 2021

14th AMENDMENT: NOTHING WILL STOP TRUMP FROM REGROUPING AS A PARALLEL CONFIDERATE GOVERNMENT AND ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO OVERTHROW THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT.

SINCE MOST REPUBLICANS SUPPORT TRUMP, INSURRECTION-II POW IS IN THE MAKING,
TRUMP WILL NEVER EVER CEASE HIS HOSTILITIES TOWARDS A CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT, UNLESS SECTION 3 OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT IS RECOGNIZED BY THE GOP AND SCOTUS.

14th Amendment

Despite reluctantly acceding to the core requirements for readmission to the Union, many of the former Confederate states began passing laws – the so-called "Black Codes" – that disenfranchised the former slaves economically and politically.

This drove the Republicans who controlled Congress to undertake stronger measures to impose their will on the defeated Southern states. The first of these came in the form of the 14th Amendment, a more detailed set of restrictions on the states than either of the other Civil War amendments. Its main points are summarized below:

Section 1: No state may abridge the privileges and immunities of any of its citizens, or deny them due process of law or equal protection of the laws.

Section 2: When any state denies the right to vote at any election to any of its male citizens of voting age, its representation in elections for national offices will be reduced in the same proportion. (Basically, if a state excludes African Americans, then it will be given proportionally fewer seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and fewer votes in the presidential electoral college.)

Section 3: No person who has engaged in or supported insurrection or rebellion against the United States may hold public office.

Section 4: All debts incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States and all compensation claims made for emancipation of any slave will be held as illegal and void.

Congress proposed the 14th Amendment on June 13, 1866. More than two years later on July 28, 1868 the U.S. Secretary of State certified that it had been ratified by twenty-eight of the thirty-seven states.

In the intervening time, the Congressional elections of 1866 added to the strength of the Republicans, giving them the two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress needed to override any presidential veto. The Republicans began the new session in March 1867 by passing additional reconstruction laws (over President Johnson's veto), inaugurating a new period of much firmer treatment of the South known as the Radical Reconstruction. Congress divided the South into military districts and required the states to adopt new constitutions, provide for black suffrage, and ratify the (still un-ratified) 14th Amendment.

Texas had rejected the 14th Amendment on October 27, 1866, but later ratified it – along with the 13th and 15th Amendments – on February 18, 1870 to satisfy the requirements to rejoin the Union.

Source: U.S. Constitution.

Vital: An arcane section of the 14th Amendment could cause serious trouble for Trump By VT Editors -January 30, 2021076 Share by Gerard Magliocca, Indiana University Until recently, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment was an obscure part of the U.S. Constitution. The amendment is better known for its first section, which guaranteed individual rights and equality following the abolition of slavery. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment was created to tackle a different problem related to the Civil War: insurrection. It prohibits current or former military officers, along with many current and former federal and state public officials, from serving in a variety of government offices if they “shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against the United States Constitution. This section was created after the Civil War as part of the 14th Amendment to bar military officers and civil officials who joined the Confederacy from serving in government again. Now, this provision is cited in the article of impeachment against former U.S. President Donald Trump, introduced after the insurrectionist violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. An impeachment trial is slated to begin in the Senate on Feb. 8. Even the trial is called off or acquits Trump, some senators are considering a resolution invoking Section 3 of the 14th amendment in an effort to bar him from holding future office. A Reconstruction-era amendment Right after the passage of the 14th Amendment in 1868, Section 3 was enforced vigorously. For example, Congress directed the Union Army to oust any former Confederate officials then holding office in the ex-Confederate states still under martial law. It is estimated that tens of thousands of men were made ineligible to serve by Section 3. Congress then enacted legislation as part of the First Ku Klux Klan Act in 1870 giving the Justice Department authority to bring lawsuits in federal court to enforce Section 3 against former Confederate officials still holding office in other states. Three justices on Tennessee’s Supreme Court were sued under this law. One resigned; the other two contested their ineligibility in court. North Carolina and Louisiana also enforced Section 3 in court upholding in 1869 the dismissal of some state officials who had served the Confederacy, including a sheriff, a constable and a district attorney. In 1871, after the North Carolina Legislature elected their Civil War-era governor, Zebulon Vance, to the Senate, the Senate deemed him ineligible to serve under Section 3. The state legislature was forced to choose someone else. Unity versus accountability Less than five years into Reconstruction, however, many Northerners began calling on Congress to grant amnesty to Southern officers barred from office by Section 3. The 14th Amendment gives Congress the power to restore the right to hold office with a two-thirds vote in each chamber. This campaign, led by the prominent New York newspaper editor Horace Greeley, reflected white fatigue with the burdens of enforcing the entire 14th Amendment and a desire to move past the bitterness of the Civil War. Greeley and his “Liberal Republicans” mounted a presidential campaign in 1872 based in part on a platform of “universal amnesty.” President Ulysses S. Grant, who was running for reelection, knew white public opinion now favored amnesty. In a Dec. 4, 1871 message to Congress, he asked lawmakers to grant amnesty to former Confederate officials. After a long and emotional debate, Congress did so in 1872 with the General Amnesty Act. Soon Southern voters sent many previously disqualified men back to Congress, including Alexander Stephens, the former Confederate vice president. Confederate president Jefferson Davis and a few hundred other former federal officials and military officers remained excluded from public office. In granting this amnesty, Congress rejected a proposal by Massachusetts Sen. Charles Sumner, an eloquent advocate for racial equality, to couple forgiveness for white Southerners with a new civil rights law that would, among other things, have barred racial discrimination in schools. In 1898, with the Spanish-American War about to begin, Congress removed Section 3 ineligibility from all living ex-rebels. It was widely seen as another gesture of national unity, but it was another nail in the coffin of Reconstruction. Neglected but not forgotten During the 20th century, Section 3 was largely ignored. It was used just once, during World War I, to exclude the socialist Congressman Victor Berger from the House for his anti-war speeches. In the 1970s, Congress gave Robert E. Lee and Jefferson Davis posthumous Section 3 amnesty. This was again done in the name of national “reconciliation,” after the divisive Vietnam War. Today Section 3, created to vanquish white supremacy, is seeing a revival. The Confederate flag, which never entered the Capitol during the Civil War, was carried inside during the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection. Any congressional members determined to have “engaged in insurrection” may be expelled under this provision by a two-thirds vote in their house of Congress. That includes, potentially, lawmakers who are found to have directly aided or incited the rioters. Capitol police are investigating several Republican congressional representatives for allegedly leading “reconaissance” tours of the building on Jan. 5. Though lawmakers can remove their colleagues from office, they cannot legally keep those members from running for, and occupying, public office again. That’s because there is today no federal statute enforcing Section 3; those parts of the Ku Klux Klan Act were repealed long ago. Unless Congress passes a new enforcement law, any expelled lawmakers could return later. Similarly, Congress could at any time use Section 3 to declare its constitutional opinion that Trump is ineligible to hold public office again, with a majority vote. But only the courts, interpreting Section 3 for themselves, can bar someone from running for president. The issue may never come up. The Senate may disqualify Trump first, as part of impeachment, or he may choose not to run again. If he does run, though, he may have to take his case to the Supreme Court. A bipartisan congressional opinion of ineligibility would be a big blow to his candidacy.The Conversation Gerard Magliocca, Professor of Law, Indiana University This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.