BRITISH MILITARY INTELLIGENCE TO
OVERTHROW TRUMP!.
|
THE BRITISH ARE ORDERING TRUMP NOT TO
DECLASSIFY FISA-WARRANT+STEELE DOSSIER FOR THAT WOULD BE CROSSING THE RED
LINE. TRANSLATION: THIS DOSSIER IS CLEAR PROOF
THAT THE BRITISH ARE BEHIND THE OVERTHROW OF TRUMP AS WELL AS PRESIDENTS
AROUND THE WORLD, ESPECIALLY IN BRAZIL.
|
FIVE
COCK-EYED BACK STABBING COUP PLOTTERS(AUSTRALIA, N.ZEALAND, CANADA, UK AND
WASHINGTON DC UNDER THEACT OF 1871) |
Step
1: Read the 1st sentence re: [RR] Step
2: Read the NYT article re: [RR] wear
wire Attempts to BAIT POTUS to FIRE to cross RED LINE will FAIL. FISA DECLAS
WILL BRING THE HOUSE DOWN. Q Sep
23 2018 12:36:42Q!!mG7VJxZNCI293 >>281
DECLAS of FISA = [RR]
self-incrimination. [RR] in
charge of DECLAS. Due to massive CONFLICT OF INTEREST IG HOROWITZ was TASKED
to final review [speed]. [PREVENT LEFT 'ENDANGER' SOURCES &
METHODS + MUELLER INTERFERENCE NARRATIVE] IT WILL ALL COME
OUT. POTUS will not be BAITED TO FIRE when the release itself will FORCE
RESIGNATION/TERMINATION [RR].
UK/AUS (+ OTHERS) MUST LEARN THE TRUE DEFINITION OF 'ALLY'. [RR] PREVENTED [FORCE] FROM SIGNING NEW
FISA's. ALL SIGNERS ARE CURRENTLY UNDER GJ INVESTIGATION. MCCABE MEMOS [NYT [RR] ARTICLE][PROVE] THE RATS
ARE PANICKING. 2018 WILL BE GLORIOUS. PREPARE FOR 'SKY IS FALLING' WEEK. Q Sep 21 2018
|
|
ANCIENT
KHAZARIAN ORCHESTRATED FELLONIOUS CHAOS, CHICANERY AND BLACKMAIL,
MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO TRACK AND TAKE HOLD OF ANY GIVEN SITUATION BECAUSE IT
IS FUNDED BY FREE PRINTING OF PAPER
PONZI CURRENCIES! |
BUYBACKS OF NONSENSICAL BOOKS!
|
MILLIONAIRE SPEECHESBY DUNCES !
|
OVER
2-MILLION OF UNDERCOVER DEEP STATE
OPERATIVES WORLD-WIDE!
|
LAUNDERING BY CROWD FUNDING -
|
THIS CALLS
FOR THE RETURN OF THE GUILLOTINE IN THE FORM OF SEALED INDICTMENTS, AS ONLY
MEANS TO DEFEAT THE DEEP STATE AND THE RESTORATION OF RULE BY LAW. |
|
|
|
|
|
UK
Begged Trump Not To Declassify Russia Docs; Cited "Grave
Concerns" Over Steele InvolvementSun, 09/23/2018 - 11:15 1.6K SHARES The British government "expressed
grave concerns" to the US government over the declassification and
release of material related to the Trump-Russia investigation, according to
the New York Times. President Trump ordered a wide swath of
materials "immediately" declassified "without redaction"
on Monday, only to change his mind later in the week by allowing the DOJ
Inspector General to review the materials first. The Times reports that the UK's concern was over
material which "includes
direct references to conversations between American law enforcement officials
and Christopher Steele," the former MI6 agent who
compiled the infamous "Steele Dossier." The UK's objection,
according to former US and British officials, was over revealing Steele's
identity in an official document, "regardless of whether he had been
named in press reports." We would note, however, that Steele's
name was contained within the Nunes Memo - the House Intelligence Committee's majority
opinion in the Trump-Russia case. Steele also had extensive contacts with DOJ official Bruce Ohr and his wife
Nellie, who - along with Steele - was paid by opposition research firm Fusion
GPS in the anti-Trump campaign. Trump called for the declassification of FBI
notes of interviews with Ohr, which would ostensibly reveal more about his
relationship with Steele. Ohr was demoted twice within the Department of
Justice for lying about his
contacts with
Fusion GPS. Perhaps the Brits are also concerned
since much of the espionage performed on the Trump campaign was conducted on UK soil throughout 2016.
Recall that Trump aid George Papadopoulos was lured to London in
March, 2016, where Maltese professor Joseph Mifsud fed him the rumor that
Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton. It was later at a London bar that
Papadopoulos would drunkenly pass the rumor to Australian diplomat Alexander
Downer (who Strzok flew to London to meet with). Also recall that CIA/FBI
"informant" (spy) Stefan Halper met with both Carter Page and Papadopoulos in London. Halper, a veteran of four Republican
administrations, reached out to Trump aide George Papadopoulos in September
2016 with an offer to fly to London to write an academic paper on energy
exploration in the Mediterranean Sea. Papadopoulos
accepted a flight to London and a $3,000 honorarium. He claims that during a meeting in London,
Halper asked him whether he knew anything about Russian hacking of Democrats’
emails. Papadopoulos had other contacts on
British soil that he now believes were part of a government-sanctioned
surveillance operation. -Daily Caller In total, Halper received over $1 million from the
Obama Pentagon for "research," over $400,000 of which was granted
before and during the 2016 election season. In short, it's understandable that the
UK would prefer to hide their involvement in the "witch hunt"
of Donald Trump since much of the counterintelligence investigation was
conducted on UK soil. And if the Brits had knowledge of the operation, it
will bolster claims that they meddled in the 2016 US election by
assisting what appears to have been a set-up from the
start. Steele's ham-handed dossier is a mere embarrassment,
as virtually none of the claims asserted by the former MI6 agent have been
proven true. Steele, a former MI6 agent, is the author of the
infamous and unverified anti-Trump dossier. He worked as a confidential human
source for the FBI for years before the relationship was severed just before
the election because of Steele’s unauthorized contacts with the press. He shared results of his investigation into Trump’s
links to Russia with the FBI beginning in early July 2016. The FBI relied heavily on the
unverified Steele dossier to fill out applications for four FISA warrants
against Page. Page has denied the dossier’s claims, which include that he was
the Trump campaign’s back channel to the Kremlin. -Daily Caller That said, Steele hasn't worked for the British
government since 2009, so for their excuse focusing on the former MI6 agent
while ignoring the multitude of events which occurred on UK soil, is
curious.
|
|
"Lifelong
Friend" Of Kavanaugh Accuser Denies Attending Party Where Alleged Sexual
Assault Occurred Sat,
09/22/2018 - 23:07 309 SHARES A woman
believed to have been one of five people at a party some 35 years ago
where Christine Blasey Ford claims she was sexually assaulted by Brett
Kavanaugh has become the fourth person to deny any recollection of the
event.
In a
Saturday night email to the Senate Judiciary Committee also received by
several news outlets, Leland Ingham Keyser - a "longtime
friend" of Blasey Ford's said through her attorney: "Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of
ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without,
Dr. Ford,"
said Keyser's attorney Howard Walsh, who has been "engaged in the
limited capacity" of corresponding with the committee on behalf of
Keyser, according to Politico. Kavanaugh and Mark
Judge - the other teenager allegedly in the room during the alleged sexual
assault - have both stated that they have no recollection of the
incident, while a third man who Ford claims was at the party - Patrick J.
Smyth, also denied any recollection of the event, telling the Judiciary
Committee last week in a statement: "I understand that I have been
identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as the person she remembers as 'PJ'
who supposedly was present at the party she described in her statements to
the Washington Post," Smyth wrote in his statement. "I am issuing this statement today to make it clear to all involved
that I have no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any
knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against
Brett Kavanaugh." Smyth
added: "Personally speaking, I have
known Brett Kavanaugh since high school and I know him to be a person of
great integrity, a great friend, and I have never witnessed any improper
conduct by Brett Kavanaugh towards women. To safeguard my own
privacy and anonymity, I respectfully request that the Committee accept this
statement in response to any inquiry the Committee may have." On Saturday night, a
tentative deal was reached for Ford to testify publicly on Thursday,
according to the New York Times. After a brief call late on Saturday, the woman’s
lawyers and aides to Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, the Republican
chairman of the Judiciary Committee, planned to talk again Sunday morning to
continue the halting negotiations over the conditions of the testimony,
according to three people familiar with the call. Aides to Senator Dianne
Feinstein of California, the committee’s top Democrat, were also involved. -NY Times The Times notes, however, that Leland Keyser's statement "seemed to eliminate any chance of corroboration of Dr. Blasey’s
account by anyone who attended the high school party where she says she was
assaulted." If no deal
is reached for Blasey Ford's testimony next week, Sen. Grassley will be left
to decide on Sunday whether or not to move ahead with a scheduled vote to
confirm Kavanaugh on Monday. Grassley
has engaged in a back-and-forth with Ford's legal team, allowing them to miss
several deadlines to continue negotiations. While Grassley may be trying to
avoid the appearance of the Judiciary Committee panel of 11 men bullying an
female victim alleging sexual assault, many conservatives have expressed
frustration at the Chairman's acquiescence to virtually every demand Ford has
made.
Shut this down.
Everyone at the party has said they have no idea what Christine Blasey Ford
is talking about, even her longtime friend Leland Ingham Keyser!
What are you waiting for Chuck!!! Vote on Monday!!! #ConfirmKavanaugh
4 witnesses (one of Ford’s longtime
friends)support Brett Kavanaugh vs Christine Blasey Ford.
Time to end this and move on. #ConfirmBrettKavanaugh
The Senate should be
negotiating with Ford for a written apology from her to Brett Kavanaugh and
his wife and children. Also potentially damaging
to Blasey Ford's claim is a theory presented Thursday by Ed Whelan, a former
clerk to USSC Justice Antonin Scalia and currently president of the
Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), a conservative think
tank. Using entirely circumstantial evidence which could certainly
ruin the life of the man at the center of the new theory, Whelan suggested that Kavanaugh's high school doppelgänger,
Chris Garrett, may have in fact been responsible for Blasey Ford's
recollection of the alleged incident. Brett Kavanaugh (left)
|
|
am He's totally harmless. by TDB - Sep 22, 2018 11:55 am In America, we have a marketplace of 50 state
governments lying in wait. Eric Sprott discusses the week that was in precious
metals and looks ahead to next week's FOMC meeting. Gowdy: No National Security Risk In Classified
Russia Docs; DOJ Stonewalling Over Brennan, FBI EmbarassmentSat,
09/22/2018 - 22:00 251 SHARES Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) said in a Thursday interview
that the information contained in the Russia documents withheld by the
Department of Justice (DOJ) pose no risk to national security, and would be
embarrassing to former CIA Director John Brennan, the DOJ and the FBI.
"I’ve read it. Some of it’s
embarrassing for the Department of Justice — some of it’s embarrassing for the
FBI. Embarrassment is not a reason to classify something," said Gowdy.
"A lot of it should be
embarrassing to John Brennan, and maybe therein lies why he is so adamant
that this information not be released." "I don’t think it’s going to change anyone’s mind,
but I’ve seen nothing in it that is going to jeopardize the national security
interest of this country," Gowdy added. "Other than one document
related to George Papadopoulos, I don’t think people are going to be that
interested in it. And I don’t think any mind’s are going to be changed." Watch: Brennan, meanwhile, suggested in a
Tuesday MSNBC interview
that government officials should
resign rather than comply with President Trump's order to release the records. Brennan, who now serves as an MSNBC contributor,
has been a vocal critic of Trump’s over the past year. Trump recently
responded by ordering Brennan’s security clearance revoked. Gowdy criticized
Brennan, saying the Obama appointee is “part of the reason we are in this
historic conundrum.” He did not describe what information in the classified
documents will embarrass Brennan and other government officials. But as CIA director, Brennan was directly
involved in gathering and sharing intelligence used to investigate whether
members of the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government. The documents in question are related
to Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants obtained against
former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page as well as FBI notes of interviews
used to obtain the warrants. -Daily Caller According to House Intelligence
Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA), Trump's order to declassify a
broad swath of DOJ/FBI documents related to the Russia investigation will
also expose the infamous "insurance
policy" referred to in an August 15, 2016 text between
former FBI employees Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. Speaking with Fox News's Laura Ingraham last
week, Nunes said that declassification will provide exculpatory evidence,
including a dozen or so 302 witness interview forms from DOJ official Bruce
Ohr which may shed light on his significant relationship with former MI6 spy
Christopher Steele and "many other rotten apples." "A lot of people think that the
insurance policy was getting the FISA warrant on [former Trump campaign aide]
Carter Page," Nunes told Ingraham, adding "We actually believe it was more explicit
than that."
Trending Articles A Path To War? China Cancels US Trade Talks As
'Skirmish'…Following a surge in Chinese, European,
and much of the US equity markets this week amid hopes that the so-called…
Trump also ordered the DOJ to release
text messages from several key players in the Trump-Russia investigation,
"without redaction,"
of former FBI Director James Comey, his deputy Andrew McCabe, now-fired
special agent Peter Strzok, former FBI attorney Lisa Page and
twice-demoted DOJ official Bruce Ohr. A spokesman from the Justice
Department told Fox
News that the DOJ and FBI "are already working with the
Director of National Intelligence to comply with the President's order,"
while ODNI spokesperson Kellie Wade told the network: "As requested by
the White House, the
ODNI is working expeditiously with our interagency partners to conduct a
declassification review of the documents the President has identified for
declassification." Meanwhile, Trump agreed to delay the release on
Friday - allowing the DOJ's Inspector General to review the documents prior
to declassification. In Friday morning Tweets, Trump
said: "I met with the DOJ concerning the declassification of various
UNREDACTED documents. They agreed to release them but stated that so doing
may have a perceived negative impact on the Russia probe. Also, key Allies’ called to ask not to release.
Therefore, the
Inspector General has been asked to review these documents on an expedited
basis. I believe he will move quickly on this (and hopefully
other things which he is looking at). In the end I can always declassify if
it proves necessary. Speed is very important to me - and everyone!"
So it looks like Brennan's embarrassment has
been delayed...
|
|
The
"Resistance" Supports Trump's 'Evil Agendas' While Attacking Fake
Nonsense Sat, 09/22/2018 - 20:30 75 SHARES A new article from the Wall Street Journal reports that
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo lied to congress about the measures Saudi Arabia is taking to minimize the
civilian casualties in its catastrophic war on Yemen, and that he did so in
order to secure two billion dollars for war profiteers.
This is
about as depraved as anything you could possibly imagine. US-made bombs have been conclusively tied to civilian deaths
in a war which has caused the single worst humanitarian crisis on earth, a
crisis which sees scores of Yemeni children
dying every
single day and has placed five million children
at risk of
death by starvation in a nation where families are now eating leaves to survive. CIA veteran Bruce
Riedel once said that “if the United
States of America and the United Kingdom tonight told King Salman that this
war has to end, it would end tomorrow, because the Royal Saudi Airforce
cannot operate without American and British support.” Nobody other than war plutocrats benefits from the US assisting
Saudi Arabia in its monstrous crimes against humanity, and yet Pompeo chose
to override his own expert advisors on the matter for fear of hurting the
income of those very war plutocrats.
If the
so-called “Resistance” to Trump was ever actually interested in opposing this
administration in any meaningful way, this would be the top trending news
story in America for days, like how “bombshell” revelations pertaining
to the made-up Russiagate narrative trend for days. Spoiler alert: it isn’t,
and it won’t be.
Starving children are
being forced to eat leaves in a desperate bid for survival, as conditions in
Yemen become a ‘living hell’. It would be
so very, very easy for Democratic party leaders and Democrat-aligned media to
hurt this administration at the highest level and cause irreparable political
damage based on this story. All they’d have to do is give it the same
blanket coverage they’ve given the stories about Michael Flynn, George
Papadopoulos and Paul Manafort which end up leading nowhere
remotely near impeachment or proof of collusion with the Russian
government. The footage of the starving children is right there, ready to be
aired to pluck at the heart strings of rank-and-file Americans day after day
until Republicans have lost all hope of victory in the midterms and in 2020;
all they’d have to do is use it. But they don’t. And they won’t. The US
Senate has just passed Trump’s mammoth military spending increase by a landslide 92–8 vote. The eight senators who voted “nay”? Seven Republicans, and
Independent Bernie Sanders. Every single Democrat supported the most bloated
war budget since the height of the Iraq
war. Rather than doing everything they can to
weaken the potential damage that can be done by a president they’ve been
assuring us is a dangerous hybrid of equal parts Benedict Arnold and Adolf
Hitler, they’ve been actively increasing his power as Commander-in-Chief of
the most powerful military force the world has ever seen. The reason for this is
very simple: President Trump’s ostensible political opposition does not
oppose President Trump. They’re on the same team, wearing different uniforms.
This is the reason they attack him on Russian collusion accusations which the
brighter bulbs among them know full well will never be proven and have no
basis in reality. They don’t stand up to Trump because, as Julian
Assange once said, they are Trump. 
In John Steinbeck’s The Pearl, there are jewelry buyers set up around a
fishing community which are all owned by the same plutocrat, but they all
pretend to be in competition with one another. When the story’s protagonist
discovers an enormous and valuable pearl and goes to sell it, they all gather
round and individually bid far less than it is worth in order to trick him
into giving it away for almost nothing. US
politics is pretty much the same; two mainstream parties owned by the same
political class, engaged in a staged bidding war for votes to give the
illusion of competition.
In reality,
the US political system is like the unplugged video game remote that kids
give their baby brother so he stops whining that he wants a turn to play. No matter who they
vote for they get an Orwellian warmongering government which exists solely to
advance the agendas of a plutocratic class which has no loyalties to any
nation; the only difference is sometimes that government is pretending to
care about women and minorities and sometimes it’s pretending to care about
white men. In reality, all the jewelers work for the same plutocrat, and that
video game remote won’t impact the outcome of the game no matter how many
buttons you push. The only
way to effect real change is to stop playing along with the rigged system and
start waking people up to the lies. As long as Americans
believe that the mass media are telling them the truth about their country
and their partisan votes are going somewhere useful, the populace whose
numbers should give it immense influence is nullified and sedated into a
passive ride toward war, ecocide and oppression. If enough of us keep throwing sand in the gears of the lie factory, we
can wake the masses up from the
oligarchic lullaby they’re being sung.
And then maybe we’ll be big enough to have a shot at grabbing one of the real
video game controllers. *
* * Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2
|
|
|
Was
NYT Story About Rosenstein 'Coup Attempt' A Setup? Sat,
09/22/2018 - 19:00 50 SHARES Is the FBI
trying to goad President Trump into firing the man in charge of supervising
the Mueller probe? That's what Sean Hannity and a handful of Trump's
Congressional allies think. According
to a report in Politico, Republicans in Congress are approaching a story about
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein attempting to organize a palace coup
with extreme caution, despite having twice nearly gathered the votes to
remove him in the recent past. On Friday, the NYT reported a bombshell story
alleging that Rosenstein had tried to recruit administration officials to
secretly tape conversations with the president in order to help justify
removing Trump under the 25th amendment. Rosenstein
vehemently denied the story, which was largely based on confidential memos
written by former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe. And others who were
reportedly in attendance at meeting between McCabe and Rosenstein said the
Deputy AG was being "sarcastic" when he suggested that the
president be taped.
Meanwhile, Trump allies
including Ohio Congressman Jim Jordan and Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz are
saying that the story should be treated with suspicion. Jordan and Freedom
Caucus leader Mark Meadows once filed articles of impeachment against
Rosenstein. But now, both Meadows and Jordan intend to proceed with caution,
telling Politico that he would like to see the memos that the story was based on. House
Freedom Caucus leaders Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan, who led a charge to
impeach Rosenstein this summer, have said they want to hear from Rosenstein
and see documents allegedly describing the comments before they decide what
to do. That’s awarded Rosenstein a courtesy they’ve never given him in
the past. "I
think Rod needs to come before Congress this week and explain under oath what
exactly he said and didn't say," Meadows said at the
Values Voters Summit Saturday. The
newfound hesitation to oust Rosenstein highlights a cautious approach Trump
allies have adopted as the Republican party barrels toward a potential
bloodbath in the midterms. Some Republicans fear Trump firing Rosenstein now
would only further energize Democrats making the case to voters that the
president is corrupt and needs to be reined in by a Democratic House. [...] In a Friday
interview, Jordan, one of Rosenstein's fiercest critics in Congress,
sidestepped questions about whether the House should revisit Rosenstein’s
impeachment or try to hold him in contempt of Congress. Rather, he said, a
more focused push to obtain sensitive documents from the Justice Department —
which Trump's allies say would expose anti-Trump bias and corruption the FBI
— is the most urgent priority. "I want to see those
memos and evaluate them," said Jordan, who
has clashed publicly with Rosenstein over access to documents and accused him
of threatening House Intelligence Committee staffers, an allegation
Rosenstein denied. Politico cites two possible explanations for lawmakers' hesitation: Republicans are
running out of time before members devote themselves full-time to their
reelection campaigns. Republicans are worried that the story could have been
intentionally planted to provoke Rosenstein's firing in order to improve
Democrats' chances of retaking the Senate AND the House (Trump actively
moving to crush the Mueller probe would be quite the propaganda win for the
Dems). Sean
Hannity took this latter theory a step further during his show on Friday
evening, where he urged Trump not to fire Rosie and instead insisted that the
story could have been a "trap". He added that he had been told by
"multiple sources" that the story was planted by unspecified
"enemies of Trump." "I have a message
for the president tonight," Hannity said Friday
night. "Under zero circumstances should the president fire anybody...the
president needs to know it is all a setup." Still, a handful of
conservative commentators, including Laura Ingraham, urged Trump to fire
Rosenstein immediately. And for Trump's part, he hinted at a rally Friday night in Missouri that he planned to "get rid" of the
"lingering stench" at
the DOJ, which many interpreted as a hint that his firing is imminent.
|
|
|
Just
Two NY Times Paragraphs On Russiagate - A Striking Admission Sat,
09/22/2018 - 18:00 291 SHARES This week The New York Times published an epic 10,000 word piece entitled
"The Plot to Subvert and Election - Unraveling the Russia Story So
Far." It's essentially
the Times' summary of
everything that can be definitively established thus far after two years of
national obsession and inquiry into alleged Russian election meddling
and influence that supposedly ushered Trump into the White House in
2016. The massive investigative piece has the following
lede at the top: For two years, Americans
have tried to absorb the details of the 2016 attack — hacked emails, social
media fraud, suspected spies — and President Trump’s claims that it’s all a
hoax. The Times explores what we know and what it
means. But what do we
learn? Buried among the nearly 200 paragraphs of seemingly endless
intelligence "claims" wherein the reader will be disappointed to
find no smoking gun detailing any actual conspiracy of meddling and
collusion, we find two specific paragraphs — which though
contradictory — are incredibly revealing about the nature of the whole
'Russiagate' scandal. President Trump’s Twitter outbursts that it is
all a “hoax” and a “witch hunt,” in the face
of a mountain of evidence to the contrary, have taken a toll on
public comprehension. And as Moon of Alabama blog astutely observes,
after one-hundred-and-seventy-eight paragraphs featuring repetition of
"unproven intelligence claims, spin around a few facts and lots of
innuendo" the same authors
finally admit that Trump is actually right. Near the end of an
exhaustively long piece meant to chronicle the "evidence" that few
are likely to ever read in full, we find this bombshell candid admission: Mr. Trump’s frustration with the Russian
investigation is not surprising. He is right
that no public evidence has emerged showing that his
campaign conspired with Russia in the election interference or accepted
Russian money. In an astounding
contradiction within a single NYT article, the "mountain
of evidence" at the opening becomes Trump "is
right that no public evidence has emerged" by the story's
closing. Enough
said?... That's right, after two
years of almost 24/7 media coverage and frenzy over the Trump campaign
and White House supposedly being under a
perpetual Kremlin shadow of compromise, we have a 10,000 word piece
by the "paper of record" attempting
to tie all the "evidence" together which ultimately ends on a
whimper.
Again, The Times began by citing "a mountain of evidence"
in paragraph 5, but ends with: "Mr.
Trump’s frustration with the Russian investigation is not surprising. He is right that no public evidence has emerged..." Journalist Aaron Maté rightly concludes, "This is a pattern:
ample words for Trump-Russia innuendo; quiet acknowledgment of no evidence. And 0 words on what has been debunked."
|
